Research

My research focuses on how differences in political context across countries and over time impact the political behaviors of citizens operating in those contexts. I examine the linkage between macro-level contexts and micro-level individual behaviors, and so it touches on various themes in political behavior, public opinion, and political institutions. I am also interested in conducting survey research and exploring cutting-edge survey tools to answer various political science questions. More recently, I expand my research interest to politics and gender. 

Books

Lee Seonghui, Lie Philip Santoso, and Randolph Stevenson. What is the Left/Right in the Minds of Voters? An Experimental Analysis. Elements in Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press (under contract).

Articles

1. Santoso, Lie Philip. 2024. "Who Cooperates with Whom? The Role of Day-to-Day Partisan Cooperation on Affective Polarization". Forthcoming at Party Politics. [url]

2. Santoso, Lie Philip, Randolph Stevenson, and Simon Weschle. 2023. "What Drives Perceptions of Partisan Cooperation?". Forthcoming at Political Science Research and Methods.[url]

3. Adhikari, Bimal, Jeffrey King, and Lie Philip Santoso. 2023. "The limits of shame: UN shaming, NGO repression, and women’s protests." Forthcoming at Conflict Management and Peace Science. [url] 

4. Adhikari, Bimal, Jeffrey King, and Lie Philip Santoso. 2022. “A BIT of Help? The Divergent Effect of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Women’s Rights.” Journal of Human Rights 21(4): 419-433. [url]

5. Santoso, Lie Philip. 2021. “Knowing Your Sources: Partisan Media and Voters’ Perceptions of the Economy.”  Electoral Studies 71 (June) 102314. [url]

6. Santoso, Lie Philip. 2020. “Partisan Bias in Economic Perceptions”. In Research Handbook on Political Partisanship, edited by Soren Holmberg and Henrik Oscarsson, pp 294-307. Edward Elgar Publishing. [url]

7. Santoso, Lie Philip, Robert Stein, and Randolph Stevenson. 2016 .“Survey Experiments with Google Consumer Surveys: Promise and Pitfalls for Academic Research in Social Science.” Political Analysis 24(3): 356-373. [url]